|
|
|
Background - Politics on the Internet In 1996, all major presidential candidates had extensive web sites containing, among other things, their positions on key issues. The Reform Party, DNC and RNC also maintained their own, independent sites, with platform statements and information about many of their candidates. Most minor candidates had web sites as well, as did state and local candidates in many parts of the country. The candidate sites provided a chance for voters to see what the candidates themselves were saying about the issues and their stands on the issues, rather than the watered-down sound clips provided through the filter of the traditional media. Position papers and fact sheets addressing a number of issues were available from the Clinton, Dole and Perot campaign sites. While the information provided on candidate sites was by no means objective or impartial, users were able to compare what the different candidates were saying, and base their decisions on this information, rather than on a thin, media-spun interpretation of the candidates' positions, which might appear in a ten-second sound bite on the evening news. Information at the sites generally echoed the candidates' stump speech material, the substance of which is left unreported by the traditional media. Each of these individual candidate and political party sites attempts to provide a base of information about policy issues, the candidate's positions or the party's platform, and news about the campaign. They are designed to put a spin on the information presented. Since the specific goal of these sites is to get the candidates elected, such sites are always partisan and often downright dirty, especially in the case of the party sites. As traditional coordinated advertising by the parties has become almost entirely negative, their web sites have picked up negative features as well. The Democratic Party site, for example, has a section devoted to bashing Newt Gingrich,1 while the RNC site hosts a similar "Clinton Corner" feature.2 The Reform Party, which specifically rejects negative advertising, is a notable exception on this point. The party sites also provide useful information, including party rules and contact information, as well as the platforms and information about the parties' activities. General Usage
The Internet community on the whole is slightly more politically active
than is the electorate at large. Internet users are both more likely to be
registered voters and to have voted in their last local, state, or national
elections. About 64 percent of Internet users reported voting in the most
recent national election, whereas overall voter turnout fell to under 50
percent in the 1996 presidential elections. A full 51 percent of on-line users
vote in every election, a feat accomplished by only 42 percent of the general
public.3 Internet users also showed a
higher overall rate of voter registration, with about 85 percent of users
registered to vote. The trends can be explained partially by the general
demographics of the Internet. Users tend to be more educated, including a
large number of students, professors and computer industry professionals, and
the technology is more readily available to the wealthy. Individuals making
more than $50,000 a year comprise 43 percent of the Internet community. Among
the general electorate, these more educated and affluent groups are generally
more politically active than less educated, poorer groups, so it is no surprise
that the Internet has inherited their spirit of political activity. Forty-five
percent of users report having a "fair amount" of interest in politics, and 24
percent care about it "a great deal."4
|
||